Thoughts on Organization :: Writing Education Essays

Thoughts on government activityWe learned closely thesis and antithesis and five paragraphs and the whole bit, and learned to do it faster and faster. We repeated it in just the same way you defecate basketballs at hoops over and over until youre good at it....All this indicated that I was a good writer and I and teachers both probably believed I really was, and strictly because of this motor skill theyd trained me in. Dave wrote that in an e-mail discussion about theme writing. It made me wonder what the actual guidelines were for the so-called Official Style, and what, if anything, was unseasonable with its formula. After all, this is what Universities demanded of us on a quarterly basis. If the scholars and the academe imbed it to be the standard, what could be wrong with it? I had done it, been good at it. I could turn out one of the official papers in a two hour time frame and get an A. Big deal. Didnt that make me a good writer? What else is there? So I read Strunk and Wh ites version of The Elements of Style to find out on the dot what I had been doing while fulfilling assignment after assignment. Not that the subject head was all that entertaining, but couldnt they have spruced up their writing with a piddling creativity, a little humor? I was so bored, I had a hard time wanting to pick the book up at a time it had fallen from my bored hands. Ah Ha I do believe I had inadvertently stumbled upon the result of Official Style writing. It stifled the creative, humorous, and personal tendencies that I, and near creatively-intended people, personally look for in a piece of work we would interchangeable to tag as interesting. My thoughts then wandered to what the non-official style would set for writing guidelines. Would it be a writing revolution? Would it swim circles around Strunk or would it but allow more flexibility while still holding Strunks delivery as truth? Would I find out that what I had antecedently written and considered a brilliant paper was actually a regurgatation of someone elses work. And worst of all, would it be as boring as Strunk? Naturally I knew I would find my answer on MCMorgs homepage and bookshelf. So I withdraw around a little in Aristotle, Finnegans Wake , Nevin Liab, and our previous discipline assignments.